in News Departments > FYI
print the content item

DNV KEMA, in collaboration with developers and consultants, has developed a new framework document for wind energy assessments.

Various entities in the Renewable UK Wind Resource Working Group have come together to propose that the wind energy industry adopt a common framework for discussing both energy losses and uncertainties around energy assessments. According to DNV KEMA, the new framework document will lead to more transparency and advancements in the quantification of project losses and uncertainties.

"The loss and uncertainty framework will aid the consultants when performing due diligence on energy assessments completed by other leading consultants," explains Ruben Menezes, project manager for the framework and consultant at DNV KEMA renewable energy services in London. “All participants agree to report on their energy assessments in accordance to this framework.”

Menezes says a typical wind resource and energy yield assessment derives gross generation from a site’s wind speed frequency distribution and a turbine’s power curve. Technical loss factors are then applied to derive expected net energy generation. Example loss factors include equipment availability, wake losses, icing losses and electrical line losses.

An uncertainty analysis is then conducted to determine the probability distribution of net energy production. Example uncertainty categories include those associated with wind speed measurement, wind shear extrapolation, modeling, and loss assumptions.

“However, without standard definitions for such loss factors and uncertainty categories, it is difficult to compare studies prepared by different consultants,” Menezes says. “Standardized definitions will not only facilitate direct comparison of energy estimates among different consulting studies; it will lead to more productive dialog and, ultimately, improved understanding of technical losses and uncertainties.”

According to Menezes, it is not uncommon for more than one energy assessment to be prepared for a proposed wind power facility.

“Often, the results of the assessments will have material differences, and these differences typically include different assumptions regarding technical losses used to derive net energy generation from gross energy generation,” he says. “However, when both the definition of a loss and the value of the loss differ, direct comparisons are difficult to make.

“Compounding this challenge is the use of different uncertainty categories and their definitions, making it difficult to interpret and compare the results of different reports at the various probability levels,” Menezes continues. “Developers, investors and the consultants that support them will be able to focus on actual differences between assessments if assessments use a common set of loss and uncertainty definitions.”

The framework document was developed in collaboration with the following participants: Arcus, Dulas, Natural Power, Oldbaum, Prevailing Wind Farm Analysis, Sgurr Energy, SKM, Vattenfall and Wind Prospect.


Trachte Inc._id1770
Latest Top Stories

Are Fitch Ratings' Claims About Wind Farm Underperformance Unfounded?

A recent report from Fitch Ratings suggests that wind farms underperform due to an overestimation of wind resources, but AWS Truepower says the analysis misses the mark.


SunEdison Buying First Wind In $2.4 Billion Deal

Global solar company SunEdison and its yeildco have announced an agreement to buy the Boston-based developer, a major player in the U.S. wind industry.


U.S., China Reach Ambitious Climate Change Accord

The agreement between the global superpowers leans heavily on the deployment of renewable energy, such as wind and solar.


What The Midterm Elections Mean For The U.S. Wind Industry

Both chambers of Congress are now under Republican control for the first time since 2006. How will wind energy fare?


GE Blade Crashes At Mehoopany Wind Farm In Pennsylvania

The turbine manufacturer says the Nov. 2 incident is "isolated and unrelated" when compared to earlier blade issues.

Renewable NRG_id1934
BG 2015DblBox_id2032
Hybrid Energy Innovations 2015