in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has announced that he is pulling the state out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) at the end of the year, several media outlets have reported.

According to a report from Bloomberg, Christie called RGGI a "gimmicky program that does not work," adding that it is nothing more than a tax on electricity, residents and businesses.

New Jersey's participation in the initiative, a collaborative of Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states that have agreed to cap and reduce CO2 emissions by 10% by 2018, has also drawn opposition from other Republican lawmakers.

State Sen. Diane Allen, R-Burlington/Camden, issued a statement applauding Christie's decision to remove the state from the initiative.

"RGGI drives up energy costs for consumers at a time when nobody can afford any additional taxes," Allen said in the statement. "Businesses are hit particularly hard, and virtually invites them to pick up and leave New Jersey.

"[T]his is not a debate about whether or not we should protect our environment - we should," Allen continued. "However, I refuse to accept that good environmental policy must come at the expense of families' livelihoods."

Yet despite both Allen's and Christie's expressed concerns for taxpayers, the majority of New Jersey residents continue to support RGGI participation, all costs considered, according to the results of a recent survey conducted by Public Polling Policy and released by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

According to the study, 60% of respondents would be willing to pay an additional $0.75 per month on their electric bill in order to cut carbon emissions, which the NRDC says is more than the costs attributed to the state's participation in RGGI.

In addition, while 47% of respondents said pulling out of RGGI would be inconsistent with the governor's stated commitment to clean energy, only 33% said it would be consistent.

In accordance with these results, the New Jersey State Democrats released a statement condemning Christie's decision.

"New polling data shows New Jerseyans overwhelmingly support the goals of RGGI - investing in in-state clean energy solutions, rather than lining the pockets of Big Oil," said New Jersey Senate Environment and Energy Committee Chairman Bob Smith, D-Middlesex in the statement.

"Residents want us bringing about real energy independence, not just talking about it. Absent the real economic incentives that RGGI could provide, the only incentives being dangled right now are to the oil interests and their suppliers in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela," he added.


Trachte Inc._id1770
Latest Top Stories

Could New Desert Plan Spell The End Of California Wind Energy Development?

The California Wind Energy Association says it is disappointed with the draft Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, which was recently released by state and federal agencies.


New U.S. House Bill Includes Wind PTC Extension

U.S. representatives have introduced the Bridge to a Clean Energy Future Act of 2014, which would extend the production tax credit (PTC) and other provisions through 2016.


Utility-Scale Wind And Solar Keep Getting Cheaper

A new study measures the levelized cost of energy from various technologies and suggests that the costs of utility-scale wind and solar power are catching up with those of traditional sources, even without subsidies.


The Song Remains The Same: Ontario Seeks More Science Before Lifting Offshore Ban

The Ontario government says the nearly four-year-old offshore wind moratorium will remain in place until the province fully understands the technology’s impact on the environment.


Why States Should Adopt A Renewable Portfolio Standard

A new study analyzes the potential benefits of state renewable energy mandates, as well as recommends what such policies should include.

Canwea_id1984
Renewable NRG_id1934
Future Energy_id2008
UnitedEquip_id1995