in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

Representative Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., recently introduced a bipartisan bill that would extend the wind energy production tax credit (PTC) in the U.S. for five years beyond its 2008 expiration.

Pomeroy and three primary co-sponsors introduced the bill, H.R.197, on January 4 - the first day of the 110th Congress. The co-sponsors are Jim Ramstad, R-N.M., Mark Udall, D-Colo., and Zach Wamp, R-Tenn. According to Pomeroy, the five-year time frame will create stability and help assure that developers will be able to complete projects and invest in future opportunities.

"The five-year extension will make more projects viable and give people more confidence to invest in infrastructure," says Blake Seas, LM Glasfiber's general manager. "It also will create more vitality and enthusiasm in the industry, which allows us to continue to grow."

First enacted in 1992, the PTC provides a 1.9 cent/kWh credit, adjusted annually for inflation, for electricity produced from wind farms during their first 10 years of operation.


Trachte Inc._id1770
Latest Top Stories

Why States Should Adopt A Renewable Portfolio Standard

A new study analyzes the potential benefits of state renewable energy mandates, as well as recommends what such policies should include.


Sen. Reid Vows To Bring Wind PTC To A Vote By Year's End

Nevada's senior senator provides some encouragement to wind industry advocates during his annual Clean Energy Summit.


Steadily, Wind Turbine OEMs Resume R&D Investment

An increased commitment to research and development will likely lead to wind energy innovation - not to mention a likely increase in patent-protected technology.


Quebec Government Postpones Wind Power RFP; No New Date Scheduled

The request for proposals (RFP) is part of an overall 800 MW wind power tranche that will serve as a bridge to the next phase in the province's energy future.


Setting The Record Straight: How Many Birds Do Wind Turbines Really Kill?

Several peer-reviewed studies are more or less in agreement with avian mortality rates caused by wind turbines. However, one study, which is wildly off from the others, is most often cited in the media. Why?

Canwea_id1984
Renewable NRG_id1934
UnitedEquip_id1995
Future Energy_id2008