in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has voted unanimously to oppose Proposition 7 on the November ballot, primarily because it would establish an excessively rigid - and potentially unworkable - structure for the further development of renewable energy in California.

Proposition 7 would require the state's utilites to acquire 50% of their power from renewables by 2025 and make changes to the permitting and siting of electricity generating facilities and transmission lines.

The RPS program currently calls for utilities in the state to obtain 20% of their power from renewable sources by 2010. The CPUC strongly supports aggressive renewable energy goals, but determined that the structure of Proposition 7 might hinder these goals in the short term and would likely increase costs to consumers.

As a ballot initiative, any amendment to the proposition would need the support of two-thirds of the Legislature. The CPUC is concerned that this would render the program unnecessarily inflexible as new technologies develop and the renewable electricity market matures. The current RPS program provides the CPUC with the flexibility needed to address emerging technologies and the changing marketplace.

"The focus right now should not be on increasing renewable power goals, but on overcoming barriers to getting projects financed and built," says CPUC President Michael R. Peevey. "The monies that are being poured into supporting Proposition 7 would be much better spent on efforts to make sure the federal government renews the renewable investment tax credits and helping to overcome local opposition to the transmission lines that will be necessary to bring clean renewable power from the state's tremendous wind and solar resources."

The CPUC determined that the legal changes that Proposition 7 would impose would seriously interfere with - and delay the implementation of - the numerous renewable energy related programs that the CPUC is currently carrying out.

Of particular note, Proposition 7 appears to exclude all renewable resources smaller than 30 MW. Such smaller renewable facilities can be expected to provide a significant portion of the renewable energy that will be needed to meet the RPS, and their exclusion from the program would inevitably hinder - rather than facilitate - the accomplishment of the state's RPS goals, according to the CPUC.

SOURCE: California Public Utilities Commission


Trachte Inc._id1770
Latest Top Stories

Utility-Scale Wind And Solar Keep Getting Cheaper

A new study measures the levelized cost of energy from various technologies and suggests that the costs of utility-scale wind and solar power are catching up with those of traditional sources, even without subsidies.


The Song Remains The Same: Ontario Seeks More Science Before Lifting Offshore Ban

The Ontario government says the nearly four-year-old offshore wind moratorium will remain in place until the province fully understands the technology’s impact on the environment.


Why States Should Adopt A Renewable Portfolio Standard

A new study analyzes the potential benefits of state renewable energy mandates, as well as recommends what such policies should include.


Sen. Reid Vows To Bring Wind PTC To A Vote By Year's End

Nevada's senior senator provides some encouragement to wind industry advocates during his annual Clean Energy Summit.


Steadily, Wind Turbine OEMs Resume R&D Investment

An increased commitment to research and development will likely lead to wind energy innovation - not to mention a likely increase in patent-protected technology.

Canwea_id1984
Renewable NRG_id1934
UnitedEquip_id1995
Future Energy_id2008