in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has struck a blow to a joint venture between Boston-based First Wind and Nova Scotia-based Emera. The court has ruled against the state Public Utilities Commission's (PUC) 2012 approval of the JV and sent the matter back to the regulator for redetermination.

The two companies worked to establish the venture to jointly own and operate wind projects in the northeastern U.S., with First Wind owning 51% of the company and Emera owning the remaining 49%.

However, Emera is also the parent company of transmission and distribution (T&D) utilities Maine Public Service Co. (MPS) and Bangor Hydro, and the Supreme Court argued that a state law restricts a company from owning both T&D and generation assets.

Emera maintains that the joint venture is not prohibited by the Electric Industry Restructuring Act.

“Emera looks forward to participating in the commission’s process for redetermination of this matter and remains committed to investing in Maine,” says Emera CEO Chris Huskilson.





Trachte Inc._id1770
Latest Top Stories

Why States Should Adopt A Renewable Portfolio Standard

A new study analyzes the potential benefits of state renewable energy mandates, as well as recommends what such policies should include.


Sen. Reid Vows To Bring Wind PTC To A Vote By Year's End

Nevada's senior senator provides some encouragement to wind industry advocates during his annual Clean Energy Summit.


Steadily, Wind Turbine OEMs Resume R&D Investment

An increased commitment to research and development will likely lead to wind energy innovation - not to mention a likely increase in patent-protected technology.


Quebec Government Postpones Wind Power RFP; No New Date Scheduled

The request for proposals (RFP) is part of an overall 800 MW wind power tranche that will serve as a bridge to the next phase in the province's energy future.


Setting The Record Straight: How Many Birds Do Wind Turbines Really Kill?

Several peer-reviewed studies are more or less in agreement with avian mortality rates caused by wind turbines. However, one study, which is wildly off from the others, is most often cited in the media. Why?

Canwea_id1984
Renewable NRG_id1934
UnitedEquip_id1995
Future Energy_id2008