in News Departments > New & Noteworthy
print the content item

The Institute for Energy Research (IER), a Washington, D.C.-based group, has released a new report that claims U.S. government-funded studies ignore significant costs of wind power and questions the role of the federal production tax credit (PTC) within the wind industry.

Titled "Assessing Wind Power Cost Estimates," the study was written by Dr. Michael Giberson, an economics professor at Texas Tech University. According to IER, the report details the costs of wind power that commonly go unreported in studies performed by government-funded groups such as the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

IER says the report highlights several categories of costs that NREL and others fail to recognize in their studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCOE). Rather than approaching the cost of wind power from the point of view of the wind project developer, the group says Giberson takes a broader view of the cost of wind power to all Americans, including electricity consumers and taxpayers.

IER notes that it published the study as the federal wind PTC is set to expire and charges that Congress’ one-year extension of the subsidy in January is set to cost taxpayers $12 billion.

"As Big Wind's lobbyists fight tooth and nail to extend the wind production tax credit, it is important that we look at the true costs of wind power to taxpayers and ratepayers," says IER President Thomas Pyle.

"Despite being propped up by government mandates and billion-dollar subsidies for decades, wind power continues to be an expensive and boutique energy source that the American people cannot rely on for power when they need it,” Pyle continues. “Although lobbyists for the wind industry prefer to downplay the real costs of wind power, Dr. Giberson has produced a fact-based study that demonstrates just how expensive it really is."

According to IER, the study finds the following:

- The LCOE for wind power is $109/MWh rather than NREL’s estimate of $72/MWh - a more than 50% increase.

- NREL's cost estimates exclude key categories of costs such as the cost of transmission and grid balancing for far-away, intermittent wind sources.

- PTC-subsidized wind power projects distort electricity markets because they can bid as low as -$35/MWh and still profit through the PTC.

- Adding wind power via the PTC cannot reduce the overall cost of power to the economy; it merely shifts costs to taxpayers.




Trachte Inc._id1770
Latest Top Stories

Wind And Solar Are Catching Up With Nuclear Power, Says Report

A new report from the Worldwatch Institute says nuclear energy's share of global power production is steadily shrinking. Meanwhile, renewables' share keeps growing.


Could New Desert Plan Spell The End Of California Wind Energy Development?

The California Wind Energy Association says it is disappointed with the draft Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, which was recently released by state and federal agencies.


New U.S. House Bill Includes Wind PTC Extension

U.S. representatives have introduced the Bridge to a Clean Energy Future Act of 2014, which would extend the production tax credit (PTC) and other provisions through 2016.


Utility-Scale Wind And Solar Keep Getting Cheaper

A new study measures the levelized cost of energy from various technologies and suggests that the costs of utility-scale wind and solar power are catching up with those of traditional sources, even without subsidies.


The Song Remains The Same: Ontario Seeks More Science Before Lifting Offshore Ban

The Ontario government says the nearly four-year-old offshore wind moratorium will remain in place until the province fully understands the technology’s impact on the environment.

Canwea_id1984
Renewable NRG_id1934
Future Energy_id2008